LOWLAND Raised Bogs
Local Biodiversity Action Plan
SUMMARY
Intact lowland raised bogs are a priority habitat and one of Europe’s rarest and most threatened habitats. They occur throughout the UK in flat low-lying basins. Since the start of the 19th century, the extent of prime lowland raised bog has decreased by about 95%.
Raised bogs are peatlands fed exclusively by rainfall rather than ground water or streams. Growth of Sphagnum moss creates a dome shape which does not allow water to collect or flow inward. Fully intact bogs are typically surrounded by a lagg fen or wetland area which is fed by surface water.
Some factors affecting lowland raised bogs include:
Various projects are currently underway to protect raised bogs. These include work organised by the Scottish Wildlife Trust, Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Agricultural College and the Countryside Premium Scheme. The UK Action Plan aims to manage the remaining 6,000 hectares of raised bog and rehabilitate a further 11,000 hectares of damaged raised bog. This can be achieved directly through appropriate management of vegetation and hydrology, for example by removing invasive scrub species and increasing water table levels. Ecological surveying will monitor the success of this, while education to increase understanding will ensure long-term success.
1. Current Status
Intact lowland raised bogs are one of Europe’s rarest and most threatened habitats. They occur throughout the UK in flat low-lying locations or basins. Since around the start of the 19th century, the extent of primary, active lowland raised bog has decreased from 95,000 ha to 6,000 ha, decline of 94%. The remaining 6,000 ha resource is scattered across a large number of small sites. The 591 ha of open, active raised bog so far surveyed in Aberdeenshire represents approximately 10% of the total national resource of this habitat.
Raised bogs are peatlands fed exclusively by precipitation rather than surface ground water or burns. Vegetation is dominated by Sphagnum, this forming the characteristic peat dome. ‘Primary raised bogs’ have their peat dome largely intact, whereas ‘secondary’ or ‘degraded’ raised bogs have had this dome damaged, at least in part. ‘Active raised bogs’ are those where peat is accumulating due to growth of Sphagnum, or other peat forming vegetation. On degraded raised bogs active peat formation has been halted, at least temporarily.
Fully intact bogs typically have a lagg fen surrounding them, which is a wetland area fed by surface ground water unlike the bog itself which is ombrotrophic (ie. rain-fed).
2. Ecological Data
Associated rare species:
According to the recently compiled habitats and species audit ‘Biodiversity in North East Scotland’ (Alexander et al., 1997), the only rare species occurring on lowland raised bogs in North East Scotland are as follows:
Argynnis selene small pearl-bordered fritillary butterfly (species of conservation concern) - this species is widespread, breeding on damp grassland on the edges of the bogs.
Coenonympha tullia large heath butterfly (species of conservation concern) - this species is widespread on middle altitude moors but is also found on Red Moss, Netherley and the Rora Moss complex. These low altitude colonies are of conservation interest and other bogs should be surveyed to establish the full distribution of the species.
Emberiza schoeniclus reed bunting (priority species) - this species is widespread but mostly dependent on wetlands, including raised bogs.
As more information on rare species (particularly birds and invertebrates) becomes available, this plan will be modified to incorporate new action points.
3. Current Factors Affecting Lowland Raised Bogs
These can be divided into anthropogenic factors and those arising from ecological relationships within the habitat (see Table 1.). It should be noted that many so called ‘natural’ changes occurring on raised bogs are indirectly attributable to anthropogenic factors. Each factor has been assigned a score relating to relative ‘damage significance’.
Scores:
Number of sites affected:
1 = Over 80% of sites estimated be affected
2 = Between 20% – 80% of sites estimated to be affected
3 = Under 20% of sites estimated to be affected
Type and extent of damage:
A = likely to destroy the habitat or render bog restoration extremely difficult.
B = modifies habitat such that bog restoration may be expensive and problematic.
C = no lasting negative impact– bog restoration possible and relatively inexpensive.
Table 1. Current factors affecting lowland raised bogs in North East Scotland
|
Anthropogenic Factors |
Damage Significance |
|
Drainage both on the bogs, around the bog edges (‘peripheral’ drainage), and of the associated lagg fen |
1B |
|
Commercial peat extraction |
3A |
|
Fires |
3C |
|
Afforestation |
2B |
|
Agricultural reclamation |
2A |
|
Tipping (legal and illegal) |
3C |
|
Eutrophication of surrounding waters and lagg fen by agriculture |
2C |
|
Domestic peat extraction (present day) |
3C |
|
Domestic peat extraction (historical) |
1C |
|
Management for shooting |
? |
|
Inappropriate grazing |
?C |
|
Biocide spray drift |
2C |
|
Inappropriate public access (including recreational pressure) |
?C |
|
Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and other pollutants |
? |
|
Site isolation through habitat destruction of raised bog ‘complexes’ |
|
|
Ecological Factors |
|
|
Scrub encroachment |
2B |
|
Encroachment of non-native plants |
3C |
|
Fires |
3C |
|
Grazing and trampling by deer |
3C |
|
Ecological isolation through natural geography |
n/a |
The threats listed in Wynne, G. et al (1995) Biodiversity Challenge - an agenda for conservation in the UK (2nd Edition. RSPB, Sandy) are given below:
Commercial peat extraction commercial forestry
Agricultural drainage in adjacent areas acid deposition
Built developments including roads water abstraction
Mineral extractions e.g. coal, sand, gravel waste disposal
4. Current Action
Current local action is listed below.
5. Benefits
Implementation of this Action Plan will provide the following benefits
6. UK Biodiversity Objectives and Targets
UK and Scotland
The national targets listed in Wynne, G. et al (1995) Biodiversity Challenge - an agenda for conservation in the UK (2nd Edition. RSPB, Sandy) are as follows:
The 1996 report to the UK Biodiversity Steering Group contains a habitat statement for raised bogs and outlines conservation measures to be considered, including:
7. Objectives and Proposed targets
Principal Objective
Maintain and enhance the extent, and status, of current resource through appropriate habitat management, data collection, promotion, education, liaison and legislation.
7.1 Habitat
|
Objective 1 Effective conservation management |
Target Reduce impact of listed threats Maintain appropriate Hydrological regime |
Time 1998 - 2002 |
Raised bogs are at risk from a number of threats. With effective management for conservation, these can be minimised.
7.2 Data collection
|
Objective 2 Continuous monitoring of habitats |
Target Encourage survey, monitoring and research |
Time 1998 - 2002 |
7.3 Promotion and Education
|
Objective 3 Increased understanding of raised bogs |
Target Promote good management practice Promote public awareness Encourage educational use |
Time 1998 ongoing |
This objective is linked with the others, the aim being to increase public and landowners’ awareness of raised bogs. Through this promotion, conservation management and monitoring should be facilitated.
7.4 Liaison/legislation
|
Objective 4 Protection through designation |
Target Statutory & non-statutory designation Appropriate environmental policies |
Time 1998 - 2002 |
It is preferable that sites should be protected through advice and adoption of appropriate management techniques. Raised bogs, especially primary bogs should be afforded extra protection through designation as Local Nature Reserves (as with Arnhall Moss) or other local or statutory label. Designation as Sites of Special Scientific Interest, defines acceptable and unacceptable management operations on site
The action plan was prepared by Jonathon Hughes, Mark Young and Mike Davidson
PROPOSED ACTIONS REQUIRED TO MEET OBJECTIVES
|
Operational Objective |
Outline Prescription |
Objective |
Personnel |
Costs |
Fund Source |
Year |
Priority |
|||||
|
1. Prevent and/or reduce threats to the resource through established management techniques |
Construct dams and/or bunds in appropriate drains on the main peat domes at appropriate sites. Dam appropriate drains/outflows on the periphery of appropriate sites. |
1 1 |
LO, SWT, SNH |
£25,000 £15,000 |
SNH |
1998-02 |
H H |
|||||
|
2. Maintain primary peat surface free from invasive species on all sites with ‘active’ peat |
Control any undesirable species, particularly birch scrub and, where possible, improve quality of bogs through removal of plantations. |
1 |
LO, SWT, SNH |
£7,000 |
SNH |
1998-02 |
H |
|||||
|
3. Prevent erosion of peat on those sites where this is identified as a problem. |
Seal off severely eroding areas through bund construction Avoid over use of eroded areas by grazing mammals, and any educational groups/visitors Block off badly eroded informal paths with brash from scrub removal operations. |
1 1 1 |
LO, SWT, SNH LO LO, SWT |
£10,000 £50 £2,400 |
SNH ? SNH |
1999 1999-02 1998-02 |
M H M |
|||||
|
4. Maintain and enhance populations of large heath and small pearl-bordered fritillary butterflies on raised bogs. |
On those bogs where butterflies are known to occur, maintain habitat appropriate to their needs. |
1 |
LO, SWT, SNH |
£750 |
SNH |
1998-02 |
M |
|||||
|
5. Manage the hydrological regime at all possible sites to maintain sufficiently high water levels |
Where possible re-flood the lagg fen area through blocking of key peripheral drainage channels. Construct dams in appropriate drains/outflows on the periphery. |
1 |
LO, SWT, SNH |
£3,060 £15,000 (above) |
SNH |
1998-00 |
H |
|||||
|
6. Encourage survey, monitoring and research, to aid understanding of the resource and its management |
Carry out at least 3 research projects to investigate the hydrology and ecology of NE raised bogs Liaise with other universities and research institutes with a view to attracting students and specialists to sites in the north-east |
2 2 |
UA, SWT UA, SWT, MRG |
£6,000 £500 |
RC, SNH RC |
1999-01 1998-02 |
M M |
|||||
|
7. Set up monitoring programmes on at least those sites where habitat management is carried out |
Install WALRAGS and/or dipwells on those sites where hydrological management is effected and measure at least twice yearly. Set up permanent quadrats near hydrological apparatus and record at least twice yearly Set up schemes for monitoring Lepidoptera. |
2 |
LO, SWT, SNH LO, SWT, SNH All |
£15,900
£7,000 £1,000 |
RC, UA, SNH SNH SNH |
1998-02
1998-02 1998-02 |
M
M M |
|||||
|
8. Extend and complete survey of bogs in NE Scotland |
Encourage SWT ‘SWAP’ project to survey those sites not surveyed during the Land Cover Survey of Scotland. Encourage LA to survey, or commission survey of, any remaining unsurveyed sites. Liaise closely with landowners before and during survey and provide information on LBAPs. |
2
2 2 |
SWT
LA, SWT, SNH All
|
£2,400
? £12,000
|
SWT, SNH LA ? |
1999-00
1999-00 1999-00 |
M
M M |
|||||
|
9. Promote good management practice on bogs |
Produce guidance notes on best management practice on raised bogs and circulate. |
3 |
SWT, RSPB, LO, SNFU, SAC |
£2,000 |
SNH, SAC, RSPB |
1998-99 |
M |
|||||
|
10. Use current knowledge on raised bog management to guide management decisions |
Produce Site Management Plans for at least 8 selected sites. Revise every 5 years. |
1 |
SWT, SNH, LA, FWAG, SAC, LO |
£18,750 |
SNH |
1998-02 |
M |
|||||
|
11. Promote conservation of rare species on bogs |
Incorporate information on rare bog species in the guidance notes (above), including how to identify large heath and small pearl-bordered fritillary butterflies. |
1, 3 |
UA, SWT, RSPB |
above |
above |
1998 |
M |
|||||
|
12. Promote buffer zones |
Incorporate information on techniques for buffer zone management in the guidance notes. |
1, 3 |
SWT, RSPB, FWAG, SAC |
above |
above |
1998 |
M |
|||||
|
13. Promote recovery and restoration of degraded sites |
Incorporate information on techniques for bog restoration in the guidance notes. Hold workshop/seminar on bog restoration management techniques. Lobby peat extraction companies to leave bogs in states suitable for restoration |
1, 3 1, 3 1, 3 |
SWT SWT All |
above above £2,000 |
above above SNH, RSPB |
1998 1999 1998-02 |
M M M |
|||||
|
14. Promote awareness and appreciation of bogs amongst owners and managers |
Circulate and promote interpretation leaflet (below) and guidance notes (above). |
3 |
LA, LO, SNFU, SAC |
£1,500 |
SNH |
1999 |
M |
|||||
|
15. Promote public awareness and appreciation of bogs |
Produce an interpretation leaflet on the natural and cultural heritage of raised bogs in NE Scotland. Seek media coverage for any project or initiative related to raised bogs and biodiversity. Liaise with Public Awareness sub-group on incorporating raised bogs into general display material on NE Biodiversity. Encourage the use of peat-free alternatives to reduce cutting pressure on raised bogs. |
3 3 3
3 |
All All LBSG
LBSG |
£4,000 £400 £300 |
SNH SNH ? |
1998 1998-02 1999 |
L L L |
|||||
|
16. At appropriate sites encourage educational use and public access. |
Initiate and maintain contact with local schools and other interested groups (below). Liaise with local school teachers/schools on issues of safety and access on raised bogs Liaise with local school teachers/schools on conservation management initiatives. Provide safe public access at least to those sites where management is being carried out |
3 3 3 3 |
LA, SWT LA LA SAC, FWAG, LA, SWT |
£750
£10,000 |
SNH |
1998-02 1998-02 1998-02 1998-02
|
L L L L |
|||||
|
17. Promote management of raised bog ‘complexes’ and other closely linked sites |
Ensure active and rehabilitation management of the Rora/St Fergus complex of raised bogs Encourage co-operation between organisations, farmers and landowners who have units of larger raised bog complexes on their property |
1 1 |
SNH, SWT, PE FWAG, SAC, LA, SWT, RSPB |
as 1 above £1,000 |
SNH
|
1999-00 1998-02 |
H M |
|||||
|
18. Promote appropriate statutory and non-statutory designation of sites |
SWT to provide information on raised bog Wildlife Sites to Local Authorities SNH to review the statutory status of recently and newly surveyed sites RSPB to provide any information on bird populations on bogs for inclusion in Wildlife Sites survey results |
2 4 2 |
SWT, LA SNH RSPB, LA, SWT |
? ? £200 |
? ? RSPB |
1998-02 ? 1998 |
M M M |
|||||
|
19. Encourage Local Authorities to adopt/establish appropriate environmental policies and strategies. |
Incorporate all raised bog Wildlife Sites into local plans and structure plans. Incorporate a strategy for raised bogs into revisions of any ‘countryside resource strategy’, ‘nature conservation strategy’, indicative forestry strategy’ or ‘state of the environment report’. Encourage Local Authorities to prevent tipping and other deleterious activities on bogs |
4 4
1 |
SWT, LA LA
All |
? ?
£200 |
? ?
? |
1998-02 1998-02
1998-02 |
M M
M |
|||||
|
20. Encourage other bodies to adopt/establish appropriate environmental policies and strategies towards raised bogs |
In view of the deleterious affects of afforestation on raised bogs, support and encourage FC on its recent draft policy statement, which includes a presumption against planting on active raised bogs. Encourage/review the inclusion of ‘sensitive raised bog buffer zone management’ in agri-environment schemes such as CPS. Review CPS prescriptions for management of raised bogs Encourage SEPA to prevent pollution events and other deleterious activities on bogs. Review Local Biodiversity Action Plan annually Carry out comprehensive 5 year review of LBAP |
4
4
4 1 2 2 |
LBSG, FC
LBSG, SAC, FWAG, SERAD LBSG SEPA All All |
?
£500
? ? £1,000 £2,400 |
?
?
? ? ? |
1999
1998
1998 1998 1999-02 2002 |
M
M
M M L M |
|||||
KEY
LA-Local Authority, SNH-Scottish Natural Heritage, SWT-Scottish Wildlife Trust, LO-Landowners and the Scottish Landowners Federation, SNFU-Scottish National Farmers Union, SERAD-Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department, RC-Research Councils, UA-University of Aberdeen, MRG-Mires Research group, RSPB-Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SAC-Scottish Agricultural College, FWAG-Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group, LBSG-Local Biodiversity Subgroup, PE-Peat Extractors, FC-Forestry Commission.