WET AND RIPARIAN WOODLAND
LOCAL HABITAT ACTION PLAN
SUMMARY

Both wet woodlands occurring on floodplains, flushed slopes and peaty hollows,
and riparian woodland along side burns, rivers and lochs have been combined
in this Local Habitat Action Plan. These woodlands provide an important habitat
for a number of plant, invertebrate, bird and mammal species, including a number
of priority species. Riparian woodlands in particular contribute to the health
and productivity of adjacent rivers, burns and lochs.
Factors such as clearance, overgrazing, drainage and flood prevention measures, dumping and invasion by non-native plant species have affected the condition and distribution of these woodland types.
This action plan aims to highlight this important habitat and support the restoration of degraded areas of wet and riparian woodland as well as encourage new native planting schemes on suitable sites. The action plan is a partnership initiative involving local forestry, fisheries and conservation interests with landowners and land managers.
1. CURRENT STATUS
The extent of riparian and wet woodland has declined in many parts of Scotland, including the North East. In some areas, however, the riparian zone is well wooded, often providing the only remaining native tree cover in a landscape. Many wet woodlands have been lost from river floodplains as a result of clearance and drainage. In the Dee valley, for example, most alluvial flats where alder might grow are now farmed and the largest remaining stands are found on river islands and flats below steep cliffs, with restricted access to agriculture.
The condition of our remaining riparian woodland continues to deteriorate along many river systems due to overgrazing and prevention of regeneration by deer and livestock. Upland lochs often have no fringing native woodlands; remnants are generally small fragments or restricted to islands. By contrast, the less accessible riparian woods in the upper courses of rivers and burns, where steep crags and gorges limit grazing and boggy ground prevail, are amongst the least disturbed of natural habitats.
Complete survey information for wet or riparian woodlands across NE Scotland is not available but it can be assumed that the habitat is composed of scarce, small patches as well as larger tracts detectable from existing records and aerial photographic surveys. Larger tracts, forming wildlife corridors, are of key importance. Small woodland patches or single native trees are also of importance as remnants of local genetic stock providing opportunities for expansion (rather than enhancement). The following sources of survey data will provide important information for the progression of this action plan.
2. ECOLOGICAL DATA
Wet woodland includes alder woodland typically located on flushes on slopes around the upland fringe (National Vegetation Classification NVC - W7) or on river floodplains and terraces (NVC W6); wet birch woodland located on raised areas of floodplains and basin mires and along fringes of blanket bogs (NVC W4) as well as willow scrub typical of wet, poor fen sites in N. Britain (NVC W3). Also included are Scots Pine bog woods. These are ombrotrophic (rain fed) bogs with a high proportion of tree cover typically of stunted and short lived Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) established on ridges or hummocks of Sphagnum, heather or cotton grass. The majority of British pine bog woodland is found in east central Scotland, especially Strathspey. Birch present on lowland raised bogs is not considered natural wooded bog but the result of recent disturbance due to drainage of surrounding agricultural land, peat extraction, burning or grazing of the bog.
Riparian woodland is broadleaved woodland composed predominantly of native species lying along watercourses and loch sides. It encompasses a wider range of woodland types in response to varying local site conditions. The range of woodland categories include ash woodland (NVC W9), oak-birch woodland (NVC W10, W11, W16 & W17), pine woodland (NVC W18) and a variety of native scrub (NVC W19, W20, W21, W22 & W23).
Both Wet and riparian woodland have scattered distributions with overlap particularly between wet woodlands of small spring line alder/ash wetwoods and riparian woodland. There is particular local interest in wet and riparian woodlands, which include aspen (Populus tremulus) and wych elm (Ulmus glabra) as these, are the subjects of existing species action plans.
Wet woodlands bring diversity to open, upland landscapes. These small, patchy woods are often the only relief from closely grazed grasslands or moorland. Within both open landscapes and forestry, wet woods add nature conservation value out of proportion to their area, supporting wetland, fen or marsh flora.
Riparian woodlands have an important role as a link between terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. These woodlands influence the health and productivity of rivers and burns and also provide exceptional value for nature conservation and amenity. Tree roots stabilise riverbanks, capture and recycle mineral nutrients and promote biodiversity both on the bank and in the watercourse. Riparian woodland can also buffer rivers and burns from the negative influences of adjacent conifer plantations and agriculture.
2.1 Species Associated with this Habitat
The following table (table 1) lists local priority species that are likely to occur in wet and riparian woodland in North East Scotland (P = UK Priority Species, C = Species of Conservation Concern, L = Locally Important Species). The species listed are largely restricted to riparian and wet woodland, or rely on riparian woodland for maintenance of habitat and water quality. These species are, therefore, likely to benefit from this action plan. Other local priority species may well benefit from sympathetic management of these habitats, but it is unlikely to contribute significantly to their conservation, as other habitats are of greater importance. Other associated species including: - water shrew, reed bunting, grasshopper warbler, dipper, tree pipit, water rail, palmate newt, common toad, a stilletto fly (Thereva lunulata), a cranefly (Rhabdomastix hilaris) and Northern blue damselfly, will be further considered in the Wetland HAP (North East Scotland LBAP). Interactions with red squirrel, water vole and beaver are discussed below.
|
Key Species |
Distribution |
Habitat Preference |
Threats |
|
Otter Lutra lutra (P) |
Widespread, concentrated around lochs, less common above 400m. |
Alongside rivers, burns, ditches and lochs. Riparian woodland stabilises banks, providing breeding sites. |
Pollution of watercourses (esp PCBs), reduction in food source (salmonids), bankside erosion, road and trap deaths. |
|
Daubenton’s Bat Myotis daubentonii (C) |
Scattered and scarce |
Riparian habitats. Roosts in riparian trees and bridges, feeds over water. |
Fragmentation of riparian woodland foraging habitat, loss of roost sites, poor water quality. |
|
Pipistrelle Bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus (P) |
Common throughout the NE. |
Rivers bordered by riparian woodland. |
Loss of roosts (building conversion etc), loss of feeding habitat. |
|
Goldeneye Bucephala clangula (C) |
Common winter visitor. Less common breeding bird. |
Coastal and freshwater (rivers and lochs). Riparian trees for roosting and nesting sites. |
Loss and fragmentation of riparian habitat, water pollution. |
|
Great crested newt Triturus cristatus (P) |
Very limited. Two confirmed locations in NE, others suspected. |
Well vegetated ponds and lochs, wetland habitats. |
Loss and degradation of suitable breeding ponds, degradation of terrestrial habitat. |
|
Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar (C)
|
NE rivers and tributaries, coastal waters and open sea. |
Spawn in upper reaches and tributaries, migrate to sea, return to rivers after one or more winters. |
Degradation and siltation of spawning and nursery habitat due to: changes in land use, soil erosion, loss and degradation of riparian habitat. Physical barriers to passage. |
|
Cranefly Lipsothrix ecucullata (P)
|
Scattered, recorded from Moray and the Cairngorms.
|
Wetwoods. |
Clearance of damp woods, water pollution. |
|
Alder Hoverfly Parasyrphus nigritarsis (C) |
Recorded recently from near Fochabers, also an old record from Morrone Birchwood. |
Wet deciduous woodlands, beside rivers, containing alder, willow and aspen. |
Clearance or disturbance of native woodland, overgrazing preventing regeneration. |
|
Stonefly Brachyptera putata (P) |
Predominantly in the Dee, Don and tributaries. |
Slower reaches of rivers. |
Water pollution, acidification from extensive conifer plantation. |
|
Freshwater Pearl Mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (P) |
Present in major NE rivers, scarce except in the Dee. |
Fast flowing rivers with a stony bottom. Dependent on salmonids as larval host. |
Illegal pearl fishing, water pollution, loss and degradation of riparian habitat, river bed habitat degradation and destruction, decline in salmonid population. |
|
Small cow-wheat Melampyrum sylvaticum (P) |
Rare, only recent records from Dee catchment. |
Birch woodland in ravines and glens. |
Tree felling, conifer planting, inappropriate grazing – lack of or too little grazing. |
|
Coral-root orchid Corallorhiza trifida (L) |
Scarce, locally scattered. |
Damp woodlands, especially wet birch and willow woodland and carr. |
Degradation and loss of wet woodland habitat. |
Table 1 – Local priority species occurring in wet and riparian woodland
2.2 Interaction with other Priority Species and Habitats
There are potential conflicts between the establishment of riparian woodlands and some priority species. Water vole and red squirrel are the subject of local species action plans (NE Scotland LBAP). Opportunities to reintroduce beavers to appropriate wooded straths are being explored.
Water Vole
Water voles require grassy watercourse margins. A large expansion of riparian woodland at the expense of grassy water margin would reduce the availability of suitable habitat for this species. The water vole population is currently threatened by mink predation and clearance of suitable riparian grassland vegetation for agriculture. Woodland restoration is not thought to be a major factor in survival of the water vole population, however, this potential for conflict will be considered at all proposed restoration and enhancement sites.
Red Squirrel
There is concern over the spread of grey squirrels, particularly along Deeside, from Aberdeen. Establishment of large-seeded trees in networks along the riparian zone could increase problems for red squirrel conservation by encouraging the spread of the grey squirrel population into red squirrels habitat. Native riparian and wet woodland species are, however, predominantly small-seeded (alder, willow, aspen, birch, ash, rowan, wych elm) and do not encourage grey squirrels.
European Beaver
Beavers require a substantial area of wooded riparian habitat. It is important to establish networks of good quality riparian woodland habitat to create sites with the potential for successful re-introductions in the future. Beaver re-introductions in areas where riparian wooded habitat has been restored to a suitable level would bring major benefits to the riverine ecosystem.
Semi-natural Grasslands
Species rich grassland is a rare and declining habitat in NE Scotland. Altering grazing or mowing regimes on existing semi-natural grasslands will result in the loss or degradation of this habitat. This action plan will be balanced with the habitat action plan for species-rich grassland ensuring that woodland creation projects do not degrade existing species rich grassland sites.
3. FACTORS AFFECTING WET AND RIPARIAN WOODLAND
3.1 Grazing Pressure
Livestock access to riparian margins throughout the year can result in over grazing and poaching, causing erosion and preventing regeneration. High levels of browsing and grazing by wild deer and rabbits can add to over grazing problems.
3.2 Watercourse Modification and Drainage
In many areas channelisation and culverting has replaced burns and associated trees with straight channels and underground drainage pipes. Abstraction and discharge can alter flow rates and deposit pollutants. Dumping of rock and sediment and infilling can alter flow rates and cause erosion.
Drainage of wet woodland or associated land for agriculture, forestry or development has resulted in the loss of functional floodplain woodland.
3.3 Clearance of wet and riparian woodland
Clearance of wet and riparian trees for agriculture, development, flood prevention and fisheries management has resulted in increased bank erosion, channel widening and direct loss of habitat. Continued clearance of riparian and wet woodland also increases the isolation of remaining stands and associated species. Fertile alluvial flood plains have been cleared for agriculture, making alluvial forest a threatened habitat at a European scale. The value of this alluvial land for agriculture is an obstacle to the development of new riparian and floodplain woodland. Sufficient funding is, therefore, essential to support riparian and floodplain woodland creation schemes.
3.4 Introduction of invasive and non- native species
Invasive species such as giant hogweed and Japanese knotweed shade out the woodland ground flora and prevent regeneration. Non-native tree species, such as a sycamore, cast deeper shade than natives and do not support the same diversity of species as native trees.
3.5 Natural Succession
Succession of wet to dry wood is a natural process that maintains a diversity of woodland types. This relies on sufficient habitat being available for these dynamic processes to operate.
3.6 Alder dieback
From time to time our native trees suffer foliage loss due to a variety of causes. However, there are two conditions, Phytophthora disease and Crown Dieback, which pose a threat to the health of the alder population. Phytophthora disease is caused by a fungus, which typically infects and spreads through riverside alders via free-swimming spores. It has now become a serious problem in England and Wales with restrictions on the movement of alder planting stock north of this area. A handful of confirmed cases have been reported in Scotland. In contrast, the cause of Crown Dieback in alders is unknown. Within the last decade it appears to have become widespread through out the Highlands. The Forestry Commission is currently conducting research into these diseases.
3.7 Forestry
Although planting of conifers in the riparian zone is no longer common practise there are many existing sites where conifers are planted adjacent to water courses. The FC Forest and Water Guidelines suggest a buffer of 5-20 m depending on width of watercourse. Conifers cast heavy shade throughout the year. As they are shallow rooting, planting adjacent to watercourses can destabilise banks. The spawning and nursery potential of many tributaries remains degraded because of methods of afforestation undertaken before the Guidelines were in place.
4. CURRENT ACTION
4.1 River Habitat Survey
Surveys of several NE rivers have been carried out by SEPA and other organisations using the standardised River Habitat Survey (RHS) technique. RHS provides a valuable initial audit of river structure and vegetation including information on woodland cover and individual trees. Many DSFBs now have a biologist on their staff actively involved in river surveys, including habitat.
4.2 Restoring and Managing Riparian Woodlands - Information Booklet
Scottish Native Woods have produced and distributed a very practical guide to inform landowners and managers of the ecological and commercial value of riparian woodlands and the financial incentives available to conserve and manage them.
4.3 Agri-Environment Schemes
The Cairngorm Straths Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) Scheme has provided grants for fencing off riparian trees/ woods and planting small numbers of trees in buffer strips. The Countryside Premium Scheme (CPS) included the option to fence off buffer strips along watercourses.
The Rural Stewardship Scheme (2001 onwards) will combine CPS and ESA and is expected to make provision for protection and enhancement of riparian woodland.
4.4 Woodland Grants
Larger-scale planting or management of riparian and wet woods is supported by the Farm Woodland Premium Scheme and the Woodland Grant Scheme. Establishment of new woodland cover on arable or improved grassland that may have been converted from wet or riparian woods in the past is encouraged. Woodland Improvement Grants (WIGs) are available from FC to support one-off woodland biodiversity enhancement projects including schemes to enhance riparian and wet woodland.
4.5 Forest and Water Guidelines
The FC Forest and Water Guidelines outline best practice for the management of forestry adjacent to watercourses. To comply with this guidance FE are improving the management of all riparian forest during felling and re-planting, this involves converting or rehabilitating areas of riparian woodland from stands of exotic conifers.
4.6 Specific North East Based Projects
The following initiatives concerned with riparian forestry, environmental protection and habitat restoration are proposed or in progress:
5. BENEFITS
Enhancing and restoring wet and riparian woodland will bring significant benefits:
5.1 Improved Habitats
Wet and riparian woodland habitats support a varied fauna and flora. Riparian habitats are valuable as wildlife corridors, especially in intensively managed farmland or forest where they also act as buffer strips. Riparian buffer zones benefit fisheries, preventing siltation of spawning areas, providing shade and shelter and feeding for fish. Riparian woodland is often the only habitat for woodland birds in open, upland landscapes.
5.2 Healthy Rivers
Wet and riparian woodland is important for the aquatic habitat. Woody debris fallen from riparian trees provides a substrate and food sources for many plant and animal species. Leaf litter and terrestrial invertebrates fall into watercourses providing a resources for fish and invertebrates. Shade from appropriate native trees buffers water temperatures, preventing lethal temperatures for invertebrates and fish and preventing excessive growth of water weed. Permanent tree cover can improve water quality by trapping sediment and filtering associated nutrients in leachate or run-off from adjacent agricultural land and plantation forestry. Fallen branches and tree roots trap sediment, provide shelter and create pools suitable for salmonid feeding.
5.3 Bank Stabilisation
Burn and river banks are stabilised by the presence of riparian trees reducing the risk of erosion, stream widening and excessive siltation of streambeds and allowing vegetation to establish. Stable banks encourage deep water in burns and rivers and root systems provide suitable areas for otter holts.
5.4 Improved Amenity Value
Wet and riparian woodland enhances the landscape, providing natural features which can be well-suited to the provision of public access.
5.5 Opportunities for Traditional Management
Some of the ancient wet woods of Scotland have a recent history of coppice management. Restoring traditional coppicing techniques would maintain appropriate woodland cover for river health and potentially provide a source of income from the woodland.
6. UK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN OBJECTIVES and TARGETS
The UK Biodiversity Action Plan for wet woodland aims to maintain the current extent of semi-natural wet woodlands and encourage a balance of appropriate management regimes. Restoration targets have been set for former areas of ancient semi-natural wet woodland and creation targets for expansion by natural colonisation and planting. (UK Biodiversity Group Tranche 2 Action Plans, Vol II, 1998).
UK Wet Woodland Objectives:
Maintain current area of ancient semi-natural wet woodlands.
Initiate restoration of 3,200 ha to native wet woodland.
Create, by colonisation or planting 6,750 ha on unwooded or ex-plantation sites.
7. OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED TARGETS
Principle Objective:
Maintain and enhance the extent and status of the current resource through appropriate habitat management, habitat creation, data collection, promotion, education, liaison and legislation.
Targets – No loss of existing riparian and wet woodland habitat. Restoration of all degraded sites which retain native species by 2010. Establishment of 20 habitat creation projects by 2010.
7.1 Habitat Management
Objective 1: Establish/maintain effective conservation management at existing sites.
Target: Prevent and/or reduce threats to the resource through continuation/ introduction of established management techniques at all identified sites (see objective 5).
Time: By 2005
Objective 2: Enhance and restore degraded and fragmented wet and riparian woodland sites.
Target: Survey and assess all degraded sites, identify restoration priorities, progress phased restoration.
Time: by 2010.
Objective 3: Expand the area of wet/riparian woodland through habitat creation and management.
Target: Expand the resource by planting and regeneration to achieve a total of 20 projects, of a range of sizes, at appropriate sites.
Time: by 2010.
Objective 4 : Ensure no loss in the key biodiversity associated with riparian and wet woodland.
Target: No net loss in the number and/or range of key species associated with riparian woodland.
Time: By 2010.
Objective 5:Set up a mechanism to protect the genetic integrity of populations of wet woodland during management and restoration work.
Target: Set up a protocol and supply stock for planting work on a catchment by catchment basis.
Time: By 2005
Data collectionObjective 6: Evaluate the status of the habitat through survey, monitoring and research, to aid understanding of the resource and its management. Liaise with organisations to assess current survey information and encourage co-operation in data collection on the resource.
Target: Identify and collate field and remotely sensed information on all wet and riparian woodland.
Time: By 2010.
7.3 Promotion and Education
Objective 7: Promote good management practice for wet and riparian woodlands.
Target: Establish three demonstration plots and distribute information on management.
Time: By 2003.
Liaison/legislationObjective 8: Encourage the adoption of appropriate policy to support the protection and enhancement of wet and riparian woodland.
Target: Ensure wet and riparian woodland is integrated into other initiatives, considered in policy documents and protected by statutory and non-statutory designations.
Time: By 2001.
This action plan was prepared by Peter Dennis and Carol Robertson
Further Information
Scottish Native Woodland (2000). Restoring and Managing Riparian Woodlands.
Forestry Commission (2000). Forest and Water Guidelines.
Dennis et al (2000). North East LBAP Riparian and Wet Woodland Habitat Action Plan, (detailed version with full habitat descriptions and additional species information)
|
Operational Objective |
Outline Prescription |
Objective |
Personnel |
Lead Partner |
Cost |
Fund Source |
Year |
||||
|
1. Encourage agencies and organisations to integrate riparian and wet woodland management in appropriate policies and plans |
Secure a presumption against new conifer plantations on floodplains. Promote regeneration of native floodplain woodland. |
1,2,3,4,8 |
FC, FE |
FC |
In Kind |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Ensure that action plan objectives are recognised in Indicative Forestry Strategies for the region and take account of the importance of wet and riparian woodland. |
1,2,3,4,8 |
LAs, FC, FE, SNH, LBAP |
LA/ LBAP |
In Kind |
Ongoing |
||||||
|
Ensure that action plan objectives are integrated with catchment management planning process. |
1,2,3,4,8 |
SEPA, LA, LBAP, Rivers Projects |
SEPA |
In Kind |
Ongoing |
||||||
|
Ensure that wet/riparian woodland is considered in the development of Forest Plans & Forest Design Plans. |
1,2,3,4,8 |
FC, SNH, LA |
FC |
Max. £15,000/ Forest Plan |
FC Grant |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Incorporate riparian woodland into workshops for LA planners & road’s dept. |
7,8 |
LAs, NERP |
LA |
£1000 per annum |
LA |
Annual |
|||||
|
Promote management to link fragmented riparian & wet woodlands. |
1,2,3,8 |
FC, SEPA, LA, FE, NERP, SLF, SWT, SAC, FWAG, DDSFB, SNH |
FC/ SERAD |
WGS, WIG, RSS and NERP budget |
FC, SERAD, NERP, SNH |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Ensure wet/riparian woodland is considered in fisheries management planning. |
1,2,3,7 |
DSFB |
DSFB |
In Kind |
Ongoing |
||||||
|
2. Highlight the need for increased grant aid for wet and riparian woodland |
Promote high percentage/complete broadleaved planting for riparian and floodplain woodland schemes undertaken as part of the Grampian Forest Challenge Fund. |
1,2,3,4,7,8 |
FC, LA, Grampian Forest |
FC |
Challenge Fund budget |
FC |
Ongoing |
||||
|
Ensure that wet/riparian woodland is considered for Woodland Improvement Grants (WIG) & Farm Woodland Premium Scheme (FWPS). |
1,2,3,7,8 |
FC, FWAG, SAC, SERAD |
FC |
10% of FWPS, WGS & WIG Budget. |
FC, SERAD |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Promote flexibility to grant conditions for FWPS to make the scheme accessible to more farmers (i.e. reduce minimum width of planting along watercourses from 15m to 10m). |
3,8 |
FC, SERAD |
FC |
FWPS |
FC, SERAD |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Encourage the uptake of management options for semi-natural woodland in the forthcoming Rural Stewardship Scheme (RSS). |
1,2 |
SERAD, FWAG, SAC, NFUS, SLF |
LBAP Farmland working group |
RSS Budget |
SERAD |
2001-ongoing |
|||||
|
Operational Objective |
Outline Prescription |
Objective |
Personnel |
Lead Partner |
Cost |
Fund Source |
Year |
||||
|
Encourage the set up of a local grant aid initiative to support management and creation of small-scale riparian woodland (Dee River Enhancement Project etc) |
1,2,3,4,8 |
LA, NERP, DDSFB, SNH, FWAG, DevDSFB |
DSFB |
£250,000 |
SNH, HLF, EU Funds, DDSFB |
2001 for 3 years |
|||||
|
3. Site Protection |
With Landowners consent promote appropriate statutory and non-statutory designation of sites and ensure that identified Local Wildlife Sites are incorporated into the planning system |
1,8 |
SNH, SWT, LA, RSPB, Moray area sub-group |
SNH, SWT, LA |
In Kind |
SNH, SWT |
Ongoing |
||||
|
Support proposals for linking up wet/ riparian woodland and expanding areas of floodplain woodland outlined in the Moray FE Strategic Plan and other FE documents. |
2,3,8 |
FE, FC, SNH, LA, SEPA |
FE |
Purchasing budget |
FE |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Review and resolve gaps in legislation and felling regulations to prevent loss of small stands of riparian trees. |
1,7 |
FC, SEPA, SNH, LA |
FC, SNH |
In Kind |
FC |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
4. Review environmental consequences of civil engineering and abstraction. |
Identify areas where abstraction & interaction with riparian/ wet woodland is an issue. |
1,6 |
SEPA, LA, NOSWA |
SEPA |
In kind |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
5. Promote conservation of species associated with this habitat |
Ensure integration of objectives and management statements with relevant Species and Habitat Action Plans. |
1,4,8 |
LBAP |
LBAP |
In Kind |
LBAP |
Ongoing |
||||
|
6. Review existing survey information. |
Review survey information at large scale resolution. |
6 |
NESBReC, GW, DSFB, SEPA, FE, SWT, MLURI, BCT, LA Roads Department |
NESBReC |
£2000/ 3000 |
LA, SNH, NESBReC |
2001 |
||||
|
|
Carry out survey at finer detail resolution. Either i) aerial high-speed video OR ii) Millennium aerial photoset. |
6 |
MULURI |
i) 10000 ii) 4,000 |
HLF |
2001 |
|||||
|
7.Assess the status of riparian/ wet woodland within Northeast river catchments. |
Distribute standard site recording form for wet/riparian woodland. Collate and act on information gathered. |
6 |
All working group partners, SWT, landowners, BCT, FE |
NESBReC |
500 |
LA, NESBReC |
2001 ongoing |
||||
|
Identify priority sites for creation, management & expansion. |
1,2,3,6 |
SEPA, DSFB, NENW, FC, FWAG, SAC, DDSFB, BCT, DevDSFB |
LBAP, NENW |
500 |
Project Officer’s time. |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
Identify priority sites for ecological engineering. |
1,2,3,6 |
SEPA, Consultants, NOSWA |
SEPA |
In Kind |
SEPA |
2001 |
|||||
|
8. Explore and promote appropriate techniques for the creation of new wet/ riparian woodland sites. |
Review current approaches to site assessment. |
3 |
Grampian Forest, FE, FWAG, SAC, Ugie & Ythan Rivers Projects, DDSFB, SEPA (HEI), DevDSFB, NERP |
Joint |
1,000 |
SNH |
Dec 2001 |
||||
|
Restore natural drainage; promote in management guidelines and demonstration projects. |
1,2,3 |
GF, FE, FWAG, SAC, Ugie and Ythan Projects, landowners, NERP |
Project Specific |
£200-2000 |
SNH, SEPA, NERP |
2001 Onward |
|||||
|
Establish 3 demonstration sites highlighting approaches to habitat creation and promote with guidance. |
3,6 |
Ythan, FWAG, SAC, DDSFB, NERP |
Separate lead on each catchment |
£200-2000 |
SEPA(HEI) NERP |
2005 |
|||||
|
9. Promote appropriate management |
Prepare and implement management plans for wet/riparian woodland sites |
1,2,3,4 |
NENW, FC, SERAD, FWAG, SAC, Landowners, NOSWA, BCT |
FC & SERAD |
£5000/ plan |
WGS-FC RSS-SERAD |
Ongoing |
||||
|
10. Explore options for use of local provenance riparian stock |
Produce list of appropriate native plant and tree species for Northeast & local plant suppliers, to help promote the use of local provenance stock for new planting |
3,5 |
FC, NENW, LA, FWAG, SAC |
NENW |
500 |
NERP, LA, FC |
2001 |
||||
|
Set up a project with local tree nurseries to grow and distribute local provenance riparian stock to demonstration projects and other identified sites. |
3,5 |
Nurseries: Forvie, Drum, and Aberlour. All Catchments. |
Forvie Tree Nursery |
£2750/yr |
NERP |
2000 onwards |
|||||
|
11. Explore appropriate techniques for the management of existing wet/ riparian woodland. |
Establish 3 demonstration sites on control of invasive non-natives. |
1,2,3 |
NENW, Don Mouth LNR, Deveron DSFB, DDSFB
|
LAs |
£200-£2000 |
ACP, SEPA (HEI) |
2005 |
||||
|
Establish 1 demonstration site on grazing. |
1,2,3 |
SNH, FE Moray |
1,000 |
SNH |
2005 |
||||||
|
12. Explore and promote appropriate techniques for the restoration & expansion of wet/ riparian woodland. |
Establish 3 demonstration sites on alternative civil engineering strategies. |
2,3 |
NERP, LA flood prevention teams, Ythan, NOSWA |
LA |
£200-2000 |
SEPA (HEI) NERP |
2005 |
||||
|
Establish 3 demonstration sites on approaches to restoration after inappropriate conifer plantations. |
2,3 |
FE, FWAG, SAC, NENW, Landowners, DDSFB, BCT, DevDSFB |
Joint |
WGS, EU funds, local project funds. |
FC, DDSFB, SNH |
2005 |
|||||
|
Establish a demonstration site highlighting Forest Habitat Network principles. This can be achieved through Forest Plans or Forest Design Plans. |
1,3 |
FE, NTS, Landowners |
FE |
In Kind |
2005 |
||||||
|
13. Initiate action to control litter and fly-tipping at identified sites |
Identify sites where fly-tipping is a problem and review procedures to reduce/ prevent problem of fly-tipping. |
2,8 |
LA, SEPA |
LA |
Internal |
LAs |
Ongoing |
||||
|
Clearance of material from 5 of these identified sites per year. |
2 |
Local Authority; Landowner, Local Community |
LA Environ-mental Health |
Internal |
LA, SEPA |
2005 |
|||||
|
Run education projects to promote reduction in fly-tipping. |
2,7 |
LA, Clean and Green Aberdeen |
LA |
1,000 |
LA |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
14. Establish network of relevant organisations involved in management and research |
Establish database of relevant government agencies, NGOs, research Institutes.
|
5,7 |
LBAP, NERP, NESBReC |
NESBReC, LBAP |
Internal |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
15. Promote awareness and appreciation of the habitat among land owners, land managers and the community |
Distribute SNW booklet on riparian woodlands to 150 riparian owners. |
1,2,3,6 |
NENW |
NENW |
150 |
EU |
00-03 |
||||
|
Encourage educational use and access at 1 appropriate site per year, paying due regard to the hazards of such waterside locations |
7 |
NTS, FE, FC, SWT, Landowners, DevDSFB |
Joint |
Project specific |
WGS-FC |
2005 |
|||||
|
Produce 3 practical guidance notes for wet/ riparian woodland managers on woodland creation, management & expansion experience. |
1,2,3,4,5,7 |
FC, GF, FE; FWAG, NERP, NENW, DDSFB |
NENW |
3,000
|
LA, NERP |
2005 |
|||||
|
Operational Objective |
Outline Prescription |
Objective |
Personnel |
Lead Partner |
Cost |
Fund Source |
Year |
||||
|
16. Data collection |
Ensure that all data collected for this plan is held at the North East Scotland Biological Records Centre |
6 |
LBAP, NESBReC |
NESBReC |
In kind |
Ongoing |
|||||
|
17. Monitor the delivery of HAP target achievements |
Monitor and report targets achieved for creation, management and expansion of wet/riparian woodland every year and in detail every five years |
6 |
All working group members, LBAP, NESBReC |
LBAP |
In kind |
Yearly from 00 |
|||||
|
Report target achievements for associated species. |
6 |
LBAP Co-ordinator |
LBAP |
In kind |
Yearly from 00 |
||||||
|
18. Promote future research. |
Identify & promote future research topics in this field. |
6 |
All |
SNH |
Research Budget |
Yearly |
|||||
|
19. Investigate possibility for marketing sustainable wood production from selected woodlands. |
Encourage management by coppicing; explore the use of willow for soft landscaping projects and for bioengineering erosion control. |
1,2,4,7 |
Highland birch woods, GW, FE, NENW |
FC |
Set up cost to initiate self-financing project. |
HLF |
|||||
KEY
ACP-Aberdeen Countryside Project, BCT-Birse Community Trust, DDSFB-Dee District Salmon Fisheries Board, DevDSFB-Deveron District Salmon Fisheries Board, DSFB-District Salmon Fisheries Boards, FC-Forestry Commission, FE-Forest Enterprise, FWPS-Farm Woodland Premium Scheme, FWAG-Farming and Wildlife Advisor Group, GF-Grampian Forest, GW-Grampian Woodlands, HEI-Habitat Enhancement Initiative, HLF-Heritage Lottery Fund, LA-Local Authorities, LBAP-Local Biodiversity Action Plan, LNR-Local Nature Reserve, MLURI-Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, NENW-North East Native Woodlands, NERP-North East Rivers Project, NESBReC-North East Scotland Biological Records Centre, NOSWA-North of Scotland Water Authority, RSS-Rural Stewardship Scheme, SAC-Scottish Agricultural College, SEPA-Scottish Environment Protection Agency, SLF-Scottish Landowners Federation, SNH-Scottish Natural Heritage, SNW-Scottish Native Woodlands, SERAD-Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department, SWT-Scottish Wildlife Trust, WGS-Woodland Grant Scheme, WIG-Woodland Improvement Grant, Ythan-Ythan Project/Formartine Partnership.
Footnote - Demonstration plots are sites where implementation has followed "best practice" and has been successful. The purpose is to provide examples of the design and practical planting of: 1. new riparian and wet woodland, 2. the conversion of plantation to native stands, or 3. The management of existing stands where intervention is appropriate to encourage regeneration of the tree stock. Access arrangements will be agreed in advance with landowners. Site visits will be arranged to act as a focal point for participants to resolve practical issues of implementation.